首页> 外文OA文献 >Preventing unintended pregnancy: the cost-effectiveness of three methods of emergency contraception.
【2h】

Preventing unintended pregnancy: the cost-effectiveness of three methods of emergency contraception.

机译:预防意外怀孕:三种紧急避孕方法的成本效益。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the cost-effectiveness of emergency contraceptive pills, minipills, and the copper-T intrauterine device (IUD) as emergency contraception. METHODS: Cost savings were modeled for both (1) a single contraceptive treatment following unprotected intercourse and (2) emergency contraceptive pills provided in advance. RESULTS: In a managed care (public payer) setting, a single treatment of emergency contraception after unprotected intercourse saves $142 ($54) with emergency contraceptive pills and $119 ($29) with minipills. The copper-T IUD is not cost-effective as an emergency contraceptive alone, but savings quickly accrue as use continues. Advance provision of emergency contraceptive pills to women using barrier contraceptives, spermicides, withdrawal, or periodic abstinence saves from $263 to $498 ($99 to $205) annually. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency contraception is cost-effective whether provided when the emergency arises or in advance to be used as needed. Greater use of emergency contraception could reduce the considerable medical and social costs of unintended pregnancies.
机译:目的:本研究检查了紧急避孕药,小型药和铜-T宫内节育器(IUD)作为紧急避孕药的成本效益。方法:为(1)无保护性行为后的单次避孕药治疗和(2)预先提供的紧急避孕药建模。结果:在有管理的护理(公共支付者)中,无保护的性交后对紧急避孕药的单一治疗可为紧急避孕药节省142美元(54美元),为小剂量避孕药节省119美元(29美元)。仅作为紧急避孕药,铜T型宫内节育器并不具有成本效益,但是随着使用的继续,节约的成本会迅速增加。提前为使用屏障性避孕药,杀精剂,停药或定期戒烟的妇女提供紧急避孕药,每年可节省263美元至498美元(99美元至205美元)。结论:紧急避孕是经济有效的,无论是在紧急情况发生时提供还是在需要时预先使用。更多地使用紧急避孕措施可以减少意外怀孕的可观医疗和社会成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号